Senaste poster
Populära
Google Scholar
« I ekonomisk debatt om integrationen av invandrare på arbetsmarknaden | Main | Ruist på SVT-play om hur det blev med den sociala turismen »
torsdag
maj222014

McCloskey om betydelsen av kapital (relativt liten)

Jag gillar McCloskeys konsekventa strävan efter att se den stora bilden. Size matters. Ur the spectator:

She [McCloskey] doesn’t even like the word capitalism, on the grounds that capital is not what got us where we are today. ‘If Scotland is trying to become Holland, then capital accumulation is how to do it. That will double your income, maybe triple it.’ But for her, that sort of accumulation is a scratch-card-sized prize — and the lottery jackpot beckons. She enthuses about the Great Enrichment of the 19th century.

‘What happened, understand, is not 100 per cent growth, but anywhere from 2,900 per cent growth to 9,900 per cent growth. A factor of either 30 or 100.’

That jump in incomes came about not through thrift, she says, but through a shift to liberal bourgeois values that put an emphasis on the business of innovation.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Tack, intressanta tips!
27 maj | Unregistered Commenterbergh

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.